There is nothing in San Francisco like downtown’s Contemporary Jewish Museum: Its audacious iridescent dark blue tilted cube protrudes from the 1907 brick of a former PG&E substation that anchors the institution near Third and Mission streets, juxtaposing modern architectural ambition and industrial history.
So trying to figure out what the place is worth may be more a question of art than science.
The 63,000-square-foot property at 736 Mission St. officially hit the market Wednesday, listed by real estate brokerage Newmark with no asking price.
In another market, the building might fetch $100 million. Today, in a downtown cultural district still recovering from the pandemic – with depressed real estate values, weakened foot traffic and strained arts funding – the buyer pool shrinks to a narrow question: Who can take on a large, vacant cultural space and make it work?
The property, which is San Francisco historic landmark No. 87, also comes with a restrictive covenant dating back to its transfer from the city’s former Redevelopment Agency under the Yerba Buena redevelopment plan, limiting its use to cultural or institutional purposes. This means no offices, housing or hotel – not that converting to any of those uses would be easy.
“This is not like selling an office building where you can say, ‘Well, these are the 20 people that are out there looking for this asset right now,'” said veteran commercial broker Mark Geisreiter, of Newmark. While it is “difficult to point to that exact right user today,” Geisreiter said he is confident the perfect buyer will emerge.
“We are going to let the market figure out where the market values it,” he said.
The building’s sale is critical to the museum’s survival as a brick-and-mortar institution, said Director Kerry King.
“This is our most significant asset,” King said. “We need to monetize it to have a future.”
The goal: Clear roughly $13.5 million in remaining debt from a $47 million construction loan tied to the building’s 2008 renovation and expansion – financial strain that ultimately forced the museum to lay off 80% of its staff and close its doors a year ago. The museum has reduced its debt by roughly 50% after dipping into its unrestricted funds, but its bid to reopen has not materialized.
Paying off lenders won’t be enough. Attendance, which drives grants and philanthropy, has been slipping for years, King said.
And right next door sits a stark reminder of what can happen to stagnant arts and culture organizations: The troubled former Mexican Museum space – about 50,000 square feet – remains empty, with no clear plan from the city, which owns the space, for activation.