California Regulators Signal Ratepayer Protection in Initial Rejection to SoCalGas

0 203



Support CleanTechnica’s work through a Substack subscription or on Stripe.


San Francisco, CA — In an initial proposed decision last week, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) recommended denying a SoCalGas application that would charge customers $266 million to study and plan the controversial Angeles Link Project pipeline. A final vote on the decision is expected in the coming months and if approved, it would force SoCalGas to either drop the project entirely or require shareholders to pay to develop the risky project.

The Angeles Link would transport hydrogen fuel, a volatile and expensive energy source, from Southern California into the Los Angeles Basin. Sierra Club and others have criticized the project for its enormous Phase 2 planning and study costs, which ballooned from $92 million to $266 million between SoCalGas’s applications. Additionally, green hydrogen requires huge quantities of dedicated renewable energy that could better be used to directly replace fossil fuels end uses. Sierra Club also challenged SoCalGas’ plan to charge gas customers for this project even though they would not directly benefit from it.

The CPUC’s proposed decision says SoCalGas failed to identify specific benefits to its ratepayers and that it would be premature to approve costs while the project is still in the planning phase. Los Angeles Department of Water and Power’s plans to rely on Angeles Link to supply the Scattergood hydrogen conversion is no less imprudent, given the project’s soaring costs and the significant uncertainties that the Commission here found unacceptable.

In response, Sierra Club’s Senior Campaign Organizer Julia Dowell released the following statement: “Affordability is rightly at the forefront of every energy conversation, and that’s increasingly making hydrogen look like a risky and unnecessary technology to use at large scale. The CPUC is correct in its proposed decision to deny SoCalGas’ attempts to require gas customers to pay for a project they wouldn’t benefit from. We’re hopeful that the commission will finalize this decision and push the cost of any hydrogen infrastructure onto wealthy shareholders, not working class customers who are struggling with rising energy bills.”

About the Sierra Club

The Sierra Club is America’s largest and most influential grassroots environmental organization, with millions of members and supporters. In addition to protecting every person’s right to get outdoors and access the healing power of nature, the Sierra Club works to promote clean energy, safeguard the health of our communities, protect wildlife, and preserve our remaining wild places through grassroots activism, public education, lobbying, and legal action. For more information, visit www.sierraclub.org.


Sign up for CleanTechnica’s Weekly Substack for Zach and Scott’s in-depth analyses and high level summaries, sign up for our daily newsletter, and follow us on Google News!


Advertisement



 


Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.


Sign up for our daily newsletter for 15 new cleantech stories a day. Or sign up for our weekly one on top stories of the week if daily is too frequent.



CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.

CleanTechnica’s Comment Policy






Source link

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.